[conlang_learners] Welcome, and some proposals for what conlang to learn

[Olivier Simon]

Sellamat Wayne !
 
I agree that Brithenig is a great artlang; it was even awarded a price. (I just don't agree on a few details of the reconstruction like some infinitives). 
But, I fear its use of lenited consonants may be a great impediment for oral communication. Long ago, I had tried to write some texts in Brithenig, but the problem is there is no dictionary from English (or another Western European language) into Brithenig, just a Brithenig dictionnary scattered into several pages. 
For example, my wiki has a French-Sambahsa dictionnary on a single page; so, with a search engine, you can use it as a Sambahsa-French dictionnary.. 
 
Olivier
http://sambahsa.pbworks.com/ 

--- On Fri, 6/12/09, Wayne S. Rossi <felianan at yahoo.com> wrote:


From: Wayne S. Rossi <felianan at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [conlang_learners] Welcome, and some proposals for what conlang to learn
To: conlang_learners at conlang.org
Date: Friday, June 12, 2009, 3:07 PM



I have a certain attraction to Brithenig, or something similar to it.

http://hobbit.griffler.co.nz/introduction.html

The idea of "migrate real languages into a conlang" is really neat to me.  It seems fairly well developed and very intriguing in concept (merging of Celtic and Latin languages).

Generally I'm ok with the idea of an engelang if it's relatively human-usable, I'd prefer a non-auxlang conlang or artlang but I'm not really into anything that was developed as a non-human language.

- Wayne
_______________________________________________
conlang_learners mailing list
conlang_learners at conlang.org
http://lists.conlang.org/listinfo.cgi/conlang_learners-conlang.org



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.conlang.org/pipermail/conlang_learners-conlang.org/attachments/20090612/82001f1d/attachment-0003.htm>